old try:Illinois legslature 2007 elderly sentence adjustment act-a Model?

. Below is synopsis of Elderly Sentence Adjustment Act as almost past in IL legislature plus statement in favor of bill. The usual politically based hysteria finally killed it .
Elderly Sentence Adjustment ACT
House Bill 4154
Bill Ryan

State of Illinois
2007 and 2008

Introduced , by Rep. Eddie Washington

730 ILCS 5/5-8-1 from Ch. 38, par. 1005-8-1
730 ILCS 5/5-8-1.4 new

Amends the Unified Code of Corrections. Provides that a committed person who is at least 50 years of age and who has served at least 25 consecutive years of imprisonment in a Department of Corrections institution or facility and is serving a sentence other than death may petition the circuit court for an elderly sentence adjustment. Provides the contents of such petition and establishes criteria that the court shall use to determine whether the committed person shall be granted an elderly sentence adjustment. Provides that the court shall consider the petition in its entirety and may not order the release of the committed person if the court finds that the committed person poses a threat to public safety. Provides that if the court determines that a committed person is eligible for an elderly sentence adjustment and determines that the committed person should receive a sentence adjustment, the court shall set the conditions for the committed person’s release from prison before the expiration of the committed person’s sentence imposed by the sentencing court. Provides for notification of the families of victims if a petition for elderly sentence adjustment is filed. Provides that the Department of Corrections shall develop a pilot program patterned after the Impact of Crime on Victims Class (ICVC), including the Restorative Justice segment, used by the Missouri Department of Corrections. Provides that the pilot program shall be implemented in one maximum security prison for women and one maximum security prison for men. Provides that the ICVC shall be made available to prisoners eligible for elderly sentence adjustment on a voluntary basis.

HB 4154:Statement of Ted Pearson
Co-Chairperson of the National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression-Chicago
April 30, 2008
House Committee on Prison Reform
We support passage of HB 4154. It is a first step in correcting what is wrong with the Illinois criminal justice system. There are many things that need to be changed. Highest on the list of priorities must be the abolition of the death penalty. Capital punishment and prison sentences in excess of 25 years
are not the norm among democratic countries. Abolishing capital punishment and reforming sentencing laws are not in contradiction; they are two parts of a whole. When all the tires on a vehicle are flat, fixing one is not a TedPearson Continued…
step forward. The car won’t go forward without fixing them all. Of course, we may be able to fix only one wheel at a time, but fixing one wheel and promising not to fix the others means that we remain stuck with a vehicle that’s fundamentally broken.
A survey of those in Illinois Department of Corrections prisons1 on April 5, 2008 shows that by January 1,2009,658 prisoners will be older than 50 and will have served 25 years. This includes 216 “C numbers” who are already eligible for parole.
HB 4154 allows for
• the possibility that people can change
• The possibility for offenders to understand the damage they have done through a process of restorative justice, reconciliation, and restitution.
There is one aspect of HB 4154 about which we in the NAARPR are not sure. The bill, as it is presently drafted, refers the cases of prisoners back to the original sentencing court for sentence review after 25 years. We see potential problems with this approach.
We believe that it is possible that, when combined with a policy and practice of implementing a genuine program of restorative justice, including restitution, reconciliation and restoration of victims and offenders, the current system of recommendations of parole by the duly constituted Prisoner Review Board may be fairer to all concerned.
The present system is not working. It is not protecting our families and our communities from crime. Recent reports from the FBI2 show that in spite of the steady increase in the number of people in prison and the rate of incarceration, violent crimes continue to increase in number. Furthermore, prison does nothing to restore the
victims of crime or heal their families. Prison does nothing to rehabilitate offenders, as indicated by the very high recidivism rate among those who are released.
Lastly, crime wreaks havoc among the families of both victims and offenders. Losing a loved one to senseless murder is impossible to ever heal. But so is the pain and suffering caused by the offender to his or her own family. Family life is destroyed and resources exhausted for the families of offenders. While the emotional trauma of crime never ends for families victimized by violent crime, the emotional and financial trauma never ends for the families of offenders, whose resources are devastated by legal fees, outrageous charges for prison telephone calls, many hours and many dollars spent travelling often many hundreds of miles to visit loved ones, and the loss of the offender’s income to his or her family while they are in prison. In addition, after their release, prisoners are almost unemployable.
The current system is based on a punitive model. Many studies indicate that punishment alone does_ not deter crime. Yet punishment is_ almost all the current system does^
Some representatives of police organizations and families of victims of violent crime oppose HB 4154. They have a right to be heard, and to be listened to.
The legislature should not, however, fall victim to corporate interests who have a huge stake in the multi-million dollar prison industrial complex, and who cynically encourage such groups to vent their anger and pain against reform. The contractors, suppliers, and construction companies that profit from the perpetuation of the current system are doing fine in the current system, at least in the short run. Our communities are not. •
The Tamms Reform Bill Continued…
legislators and audience, despite the wilting heat, was joyful. It was the result of hope that the system for sending men to Tamms will soon become more transparent and that those prisoners left at Tamms for a decade may soon be transferred elsewhere.
1 This compilation was made by downloading all the data sheets from the IDOC web site for prisoners in that database on April 9, 2008. On that date there were 41,998 people in IDOC adult prisons. Of them 4,709 have dates of birth prior to January 1, 1954. Of this 4709, 658 have custody dates prior to January 1, 1984. 177 of these 658 are serving sentences of natural life without possibility of parole. ‘ U.S. Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation, “2006 Crime in the United States – Preliminary Semi-annual Uniform Crime Report” cited by Talvi, Silva J. A. in The Nation, January 22,2007. •
From Statesville Speaks July 2008 Newsletter

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

another old try:FL Bill would allow some older inmates out of prison

Measure would allow some older inmates out of prison
Gainsville.com; By Suevon Lee,Staff writer
Published: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 5:28 p.m.

As Florida grapples with a budget shortfall and experiences a swelling in its prison ranks, some lawmakers are introducing new measures that could directly impact the incarcerated elderly while saving the state some dollars.
In what marks the latest sign that legislators are acknowledging the state’s rising prison population and its cost to taxpayers, Sen. Chris L. Smith (D-West Palm Beach) has proposed the early release of certain elderly inmates who meet a specific criteria and come under review before the Parole Commission.
Although other states have adopted such an early-release policy, Florida has yet to consider such a measure, even as one-third of its state prison population is expected to be older than age 50 by 2030.
Senate Bill 484, and its companion House Bill 1515, proposes that inmates age 50 and older who have served at least 25 consecutive years of prison be eligible to petition the Parole Commission for early release. The petition would trigger a notification to the victim or victim’s family. Those cleared under this proposed Elderly Rehabilitated Inmate Program would be required to perform 10 hours of community service for each year served in prison and be subject to electronic monitoring for at least a year.
“This is putting another tool in the toolbox,” said Smith, an attorney and first-term senator. “With our budget situation, we’re having to cut everywhere — health services and education — yet our corrections’ budget is still very robust.”

Studies concur that the cost of elderly inmate care takes up a substantial portion of states’ corrections budgets. The average yearly cost for an elderly inmate is $70,000, according to the Pew Center on the States. This is higher than average because of the greater medical attention they demand, exacerbated by the stress of isolation and possible victimization in prison, the organization finds.
At the end of fiscal year 2008, inmates age 50 and older comprised 15.1 percent of Florida’s total inmate population — that figure alone represents one-third of the estimated number of inmates expected to die in prison, according to a recent study by Florida’s Correctional Medical Authority, an independent body that evaluates the quality of physical and mental health services provided to Florida’s inmates.
Elderly inmates, the report found, have greater health problems and thereby consume more services and are prescribed more medications than their younger counterparts.
“Much of the literature on aging inmates reports that these inmates cost an average of three times as much as younger inmates,” that annual report concluded.

In an interview, Smith, 40, said he was driven to introduce such legislation this session based on what he’s learned other states around the country are doing to address their fiscal challenges.
In 2008, seven states — Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wyoming — established medical or geriatric parole, while in 2009, New York, Washington and Wisconsin began implementing similar policies targeting its elderly inmates.
“There has been a very long-standing concern over the growth of older inmates in prison. There is this wave of financial problems that are making the concerns more urgent,” said Tina Chiu of the Vera Institute of Justice, an independent New York organization focusing on justice policy.
That is the kind of impetus behind Smith’s proposal.

“Instead of spending $100,000 on medical care for an elderly prisoner, I’d rather use that to put a couple of kids though college,” he said.
The Florida Department of Corrections, which operated on a $2.2 billion budget last fiscal year, spent $439 million on health services alone for approximately 101,000 inmates in the last year, according to George MacLafferty, DOC’s assistant secretary for Health Services.
Certain facilities around the state are even specially outfitted to handle elderly inmates, including Zephyrhills Correctional Institution in Pasco County and River Junction Work Camp in Chattahoochee.
While it’s unclear exactly how many inmates Smith’s proposed legislation as written would ultimately affect, Florida TaxWatch, a private, non-partisan research institute, found at least 500 inmates could qualify as of January 2010 under similar guidelines.
The organization found that the state could save $2 million in 2010-2011 and $3 million the next fiscal year if inmates older than 65 serving a sentence other than capital murder, and who have served at least 20 years of their sentence, were released early.
Smith’s bill, which has been discussed only in the Senate’s Criminal Justice Committee since being introduced March 1, has its opponents, including law enforcement arms, which find the criteria, particularly the age threshold of 50, as “problematic.”
“The last thing we want is someone to be released early from a sentence to go back to the community to commit another violent crime,” said Steve Casey, executive director of the Tallahassee-based Florida Sheriff’s Association. “The sheriffs are always going to take a very conservative view of these matters. We’re there to protect the public.”

Smith, who spent eight terms in the Florida House before being elected to the Senate last year, doesn’t expect the bill to pass this legislative session, but he’s hopeful that it’s at least fostering dialogue among fellow lawmakers.
“This is the first time this has come up,” he said. “The discussion is starting and maybe that’s where we get this year.
“This may only affect 10 people — 10 people who are basically dying, and we’re spending hundreds of thousands of dollars [on incarceration],” he added.
Contact Suevon Lee at 867-4065 or suevon.lee@starbanner.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Crime Decreases with Age:DOJ

DOJ Charts

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment